Summary) what kind of history? 1

#Teleological(목적론) accounts of new media

From cave painting to mobile phones
-In Rheingold's historical scheme

From photography to telematics
-extracting some sense from teleologies, Peter Weibel's: 8 stage historical model of the technologic developments of image production and transmission

Seeing the limits of new media telelogies
-Paul Mayer: from abstract system of logic

Foucault and genealogies(계보학) of new media
-Mark Poster's concept, Jay Bolter & Richard Grusin's concept: foucauldian perspective

#New media and the modernist concept of progress

Deferred future of new media
-because of technological underdevelopment?
-be used and understanding according to older, existing practices and ideas

The view of modernist aesthetic
-medium has to be genuinely new from the past and old media
(ex: Painter-> important painting materials)

Modernist(ex: 피카소)--difference--아방가르드(ex: 뒤샹)
(Modernist-> respect tradition)

Gene Youngblood
-"the tyranny of perceptual imperialists(경험주의)"
(perceptual->physical contact(ex: 첫만남은 외모가 중요하다.))
-most value->real experience)

Steve Holzmann
- existing uses of new media fail to exploit those special qualities

Modernist viewpoints
-전통중시(ex: Greenberg -> important materials, Macluhan)

Pictorialist
-Photograhper-> photo like art(technologie downgrade)

Raymond Willams "Media technology does not have any essence

##My Opinion

Art is start reason -> the instrument of discovery (Reference: movie "A space odyssey")

Art is continue develop + Instrument is continue develop = Art is the rapid growth

Some peoples think -> good technology -> not art
But my think -> Some all medium is the whole art.